Date of publication: 2017-08-24 20:50
Rights under question Mr Tsui said neither the privacy of students nor school activities would be affected by the cameras. The closed-circuit television only operates between 9 pm and 6 am.
Law enforcement agencies say surveillance cameras have become a valuable crime-fighting weapon, like capturing the infamous Craigslist killer, who was identified on hotel surveillance.
Surveillance cameras have several benefits. An obvious benefit is that the police can catch criminals in the act, thus reducing crime. This will make the streets safer for ordinary people. A more important point is that criminals, particularly offenders or petty criminals will be deterred. They will not be tempted to carry out crimes, and thus society will be a lot safer. Cameras are also cost-effective and unobtrusive. Authorities do not need to spend large amounts of money on police.
In conclusion, although there are definite advantages to using surveillance devices such as cameras, we need to balance the need for security with respect for the individual 8767 s privacy and freedom. If we do not trust the members of society, a situation like George Orwell 8767 s 8775 6989 8776 could be the result.
Kelly said, "We believe (surveillance) acts as a deterrent and if of course something happens, it provides us with a record. Or potentially provides us with information."
Chris Calabrese, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, told CBS News , "These cameras are completely unregulated, there's rarely a discussion about whether it's appropriate to put a camera up, they're simply installed and we think that's slowly eroding the way people act in public."
She also demonstrated how you can watch surveillance camera feeds live from the famed Wrigley Field in Chicago via the website . The website, Koeppen showed, allows anyone, anywhere to view the surveillance camera feeds live.
Having a security camera on a street where crimes have been or might logically be committed is fine if it helps deter criminal activity. And of course they are fine in stores in the general areas. But people should be warned that they are there and they should not be in dressing rooms or other private areas because that is an invasion of privacy.
''It's just an invasion of privacy. We don't think it's acceptable that we should be videoed for 79 hours a day and then MPI tell us it's going to cost you $75,555 to roll all of this stuff onto your boat."
I don't think they are an invasion of privacy because they help police catch criminals and help people find out what really happened. They also see if people are speeding or driving. If you don't want the police to see you, you should close your curtains and don't let them see you.
A lot of people are worried about face detection. Many fear that it is a breach of the Human Rights Act. The idea of storing everyone’s photo in a database and having the ability to pick out someone’s face in crisp, high-definition images, which could be half a mile away, is what scares people the most. There is also the fact that they can use your photo and run it against a database of wanted individuals. Some people have even been known to put in the extra effort of covering security cameras with bags to disable them from capturing pictures, along with other crazy CCTV destruction techniques ( -- yes, someone was serious when they wrote this ).
7M has 95+ years of combined experience in security consulting, design and implementation, using the best techniques and practices from our extensive experience and product knowledge, making sure we protect your assets.
This is against the law. Do you want to be watched all the time? CCTVs invade one's privacy. Students would feel uncomfortable and this would
effect their educations and skills and their test scores. Also, do you want to have your private spots exposed? Really, if you say yes to this question, you are really crazy.